kenrg ***?ked:
YouTube about to put an end to the video blogging with the new redesign? ? there a ***?ture for vloggers on pi? small places ***? Vloggerheads? Watch the video and ***?e what I think. videobloggingweek2009.blogspot.com www.businessinsider.com
Create a video blog
In football (Rugby League) in Australia the Maltese ***?lcon has quite a different meaning.
Thanks - The changes here, once the were unveiled, were so minor, I wonder if it’s actually helped their revenue. I hope so.
I would pay 25 bucks a year for that kind of membership “It’s the sutf that dreams are made of”. Love your videos Kenrg. I wish I had a partner account lol. anyways great video keep them coming.
That’s what they’ve been trying, ****? they’re still losing about a million dollars each day. I’m sure they’re trying to ***?ll ***? much ad space, at the best rate they can get. Hopefully the new changes will help them with that.
No, we the users can’t be charged and there should be no video limit, the only reason ***?ople post is for ***?n then the great glory of how youtube was founded will be ruined, Chad and Steve ****?ted us to sign up freely and make money, not spend money. Basically youtube needs more ad revunue, instead of charging us to use the tube, they need to increase revenue by posting a few more ads and charging the advertisers by the day, for 24 hour ad you have to pay 5.00, one week 10.00,2 weeks 13.99 etc
agreed! I never go past my subscription page (which I ***.me is the default for most if not all YouTubers?) I’ve not looked at the most discussed/rated etc pages for a very long ***?me.
As we have just ***?en, the big hullabaloo was basically for nothing. Of course the changes meant nothing; we can still view our subscriptions, comment to each, etc - all the things that formed the community. Yes, we must support the company that provides all this; including helping to make them profitable (even if it means paying a small membership fee someday).
Kenrg, outside of the ***?ct that I feel that vbloggers will always be able to vblog and we will always have a community and that nothing YOutube has done has deterred that…outside of all of that, ****?gle has made no money. If ***?ople ****?t to vblog here, I recommend ***?ll on support otherwise, Youtube will be gone and we will all miss it here. ~Raven
Seeing the redesign now, frankly, if nobody had told me there were any changes, I doubt I’d notice them. ***? usual, a huge big deal about nothing much.
I don’t have a problem with YouTube’s redesign. ****?gle owns this hotel and we are guests who get to have a room of our own for free. Not a bad deal. Let’s be ****?d guests and support YouTube.
I’m greatly unimpressed by the end of the world, if this was truly that. Another big deal over a big yawn is the end result (as usual).
(PS) ***?nny thing that ****?gle was announcing pay-per-view material on YouTube just ***? I was typing my above comment. “With respect to how it’ll get monetized, our first priority is on the advertising side. We do expect over ***?me to ***?e micropayments and other forms of subscription models coming ***? well,” says Eric Schmidt.
Anyway, this particular “end of YouTube” ***?ems to be rather unspectacular.
Well, I’m taking my first look at the “New YouTube” and frankly, I don’t ***?e what the big ****?re was about.. I have no problem with it at all. ****? still no easier way to find vloggers…
I love The Maltese ***?lcon! That film is a classic and Bogart is the man! The ****?k is also an amazing piece of writing. It’s what every who-done-it should be like.
What was the topic again? Oh yeah, Vlogs or something. I would prefer vlogs be in a ***?parate ***?archable area. I would watch more of them if they were split off from everything else and easier to find.
(2/2) They could charge for HD-quality viewing, downloadable videos, profile banners and other visual ***?stomisations, ***?stom thumbnail pics, the ability to write longer comments or maintain a written blog on your profile, or maybe just a “no ads” option for the entire site (though this might alienate advertisers). You could ***?e these up into nice little feature packages, or ***?ered memberships, or even one-time payments for the better HD content.
(1/2) Interesting ideas here (especially the whole ***?lconry concept), ****? I’m not sure if paying for increased storage is the way to go. Even if amateur content is increasingly marginalised, YouTube will still ****?t to have it, just to ***.re their dominance in the market. Basic video watching must remain free in any case. I can ***?e them charging for ***?rks, though, that are more removed from the core ***?nctionality of the site:
I think it’d be ****?d if they kept what they ***?rrently offer for free the same. There are other sites (like viddyou) who offer a subscription that’s yearly based ($5-$10 for the year) in return for more upload space. That, I could ***?e being reasonable. For partners maybe that subscription fee could be deferred through the profit from monetized videos.
Kenrg - Exactly, they haven’t abandoned the ‘vlog’ ***?nction of their site, though it may not be the core focus. I ***?rsonally like that the vlogging ‘community’ is sort of underground.
MyCluein - I’m not sure YouTube is quite ***? evil ***? you ***?em to be making it out to be ****? they are a corporation and corporations do exist to make profit.
So much on the web has been given away for free, that companies are having a hard ***?me breaking through that ***?rceived constant. Newspapers and magazines have always made money through ads, ****? the vast majority still have a cover *****?e….and you don’t get to create and post your own content in them.
Right - They spend that (and more) for one evening’s entertainment, or on online ***?mes, etc., ****? once something is “free” it’s hard to convince folks that nothing is ever *really* free. ***? to the negative impact, I agree; ***? long ***? I have my subscription page, I don’t care what happens to the front page and main index.
Good vlog, sir. I don’t expect to ***?e much of a negative impact on the community here, in ***?ct, I actually think this might be a ****?d thing. Money for YT and maybe make things a little harder for the masses to crash the party.
I would not be opposed to a subscription model. Your *****?ing is reasonable, maybe a bit low. I thinks it’s ***?nny how that’s ****?h a deal breaker for ***?ople. They spend more than that to ***?e one movie at a theatre for 2 hours of entertainment. (more)
It was a gift from Bill K, many years ago. And if the kind folks at Maker’s ****?t to ***?nd a coupon or two my way, it would be much appreciated, ****? not necessary.
if YT really “cared about us” they would have more ***?ople dedicated to ***?stomer ***?rvice & less to tweaking the interface, videos & channels disappear without due process or appeal, YT also blocks vids from view in different counties too, not that YT is “bad” ****? they don’t really “care about us,” it’s a commercial venture designed to milk our content for ***?nnies & in return we use it to express ourselves, quid pro quo
Where did you get the Maltese ***?lcon? And how much is Makers Mark paying you for sponsorship?
True; there’s a lot more to “original user content” than just traditional vlogs. ***? to my made-up membership fees, I don’t know… Could be interesting to ***?e if they ever do make ****?h a distinction.